Sidewalk bicycling restrictions

From Policy Atlas
Jump to: navigation, search

Sidewalk bicycling restrictions are policies that restrict cyclists from riding bicycles on the sidewalk. These policies are intended to make sidewalks safer and prioritize pedestrian right-of-way. They aim to protect a wide variety of travelers, including pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers.

Restrictions on sidewalk bicycling differ between states. In some areas, cyclists are limited to roads; in others, cyclists can choose whether or not they wish to bike alongside cars. Sidewalk bicycling restrictions are not universally applicable but can be a legal barrier in many cyclists’ choice to ride on the road or on the sidewalk. Varying state and local policies are potentially due to the conditions of specific localities; the positions of driveways, blind spots, and lane markings impact the safety conditions and behavior of individual cyclists. The volume of pedestrians in specific areas and the ages of people in those populations are common points of consideration when establishing bicycle-sidewalk policies. Some view biking on sidewalks as the safer option, but in doing so, cyclists come in direct conflict with pedestrians; further, this behavior is also associated with many bicycle-car collisions.

These policies are intended to protect travelers, regardless of mode of transportation. For example, sidewalk bicycling restrictions may reduce automobile accidents by preventing cyclists from crossing driveways or entering a driver’s blind spots (reducing the number of times a car may have to swerve around a cyclist or stop abruptly).

Bicycles are treated similarly to automobiles under the law, and cyclists can be ticked for violating sidewalk bicycle laws.

CONCEPT


Concept.png

Goals


Examples

Conceptual example: A jurisdiction faces a problem: pedestrians and cyclists alike are getting injured from sharing sidewalks. In order to address this problem, the jurisdiction takes steps to reduce injuries by implementing a sidewalk bicycling restriction. By implementing the policy, fewer injuries occur, resulting in lower medical costs and safer conditions for all types of travelers, benefitting the jurisdiction by making it safer as a whole.


Specific example: California bike policies vary among counties, cities, and municipalities. California does not have a specific statute that authorizes or prohibits bicycling on sidewalks. The City of Los Angeles allows biking on sidewalks unless it is done “with a willful or wanton disregard for the safety of persons or property.” Other cities in LA County ban biking on sidewalks entirely, while still others only ban it in designated “business districts.” Common to these policies is the underlying idea that the safety of the community should be prioritized. [1]


Tradeoffs

Tradeoffs.png

Tradeoffs of implementing this policy may include:

  1. Decreased commuting via bicycle due to cyclists’ fear of riding in the road.
  2. Determining weight of factors when creating the policy—depending on exceptions to restrictions, may limit the ability of certain populations (e.g. children, the physically disabled) to safely bike.
  3. Increased number of bicycle-auto accidents during the policy’s transitional period.
  4. Negative impact on car traffic flow from increased volume of cyclists on the road.
  5. Crowding on roads among bikers, resulting in increased bicycle-bicycle accidents.
Compatibility Assessment

Compatibility Assessment.png

If answered yes, the following questions indicate superior conditions under which the policy is more likely to be appropriate:

  1. Is there a high volume of pedestrian transportation in the locality? I.e., are current sidewalks densely crowded and should bicyclists be prohibited from these already-crowded areas? Would prohibiting bicycles from sidewalks alleviate the problem?
  2. Is there an existing high volume of bicycle transportation in the locality? I.e., is bicycle travel common in the locality and does that bicycle travel overcrowd sidewalks?
  3. Does the area have a lot of residential districts? Are there a lot of children living in or common to the area?
  4. Is the area highly developed? Are business transactions common in the area?
  5. Are bicycle accidents common in the area? Are those accidents primarily on sidewalks?
  6. Is there demand for the policy? (e.g. from families and business owners)
  7. Can the program be cost-effectively enforced?
  8. Are sidewalk bicycling restrictions likely to change behavior?
Design

Design.png

Assuming that a jurisdiction has decided to adopt the policy, the following questions will need to be answered when determining how to implement this policy:

  1. How should the municipality weigh demographic factors when determining the policy? I.e. how should factors such as the age and physical ability of riders affect where the policy is put in place and the intensity of the restrictions?
  2. How should the municipality weigh environmental and community factors when determining the policy? I.e. how should factors such as the presence of blind curves, lane markings, and curb cuts impact the intensity of restrictions in an area?
  3. What is the penalty towards a rider who does not follow the new restriction? I.e., what happens if a rider continues to ride a bike on the sidewalk?
  4. Where should the bounds of a particular policy be drawn? I.e., how should a locality determine where geographically a policy begins and ends?
  5. Could the policy incorporate speed of bike travel into the policy? (e.g. allowing biking up to a certain speed in MPH)
  6. What criteria should determine whether a locality needs a sidewalk bicycling restriction at all? I.e., should the implementation of a sidewalk bicycling policy be based on the population density of the area, the primary modes of transportation of the area, or some other factor entirely?
  7. What factors are most important to the jurisdiction? I.e., what do residents in the locality prioritize, and how does that shape the future policy? (e.g. safety, convenience, efficiency)


ADOPTION


Adoption.png

PolicyGraphics
  • For governance level(s): Local.
Adopters

Notable entities who have implemented or adopted this policy include:



STAKEHOLDERS


Supporters

Supporters.png


Opponents

Opponents.png



REFERENCES


Research

Research.png


Resources

Resources.png


Footnotes
  1. LADOT Bike Blog (2014). “LA County Sidewalk Riding: Part1,” LADOT Bike Blog. Available at: [1].
  2. “Bike Smart,” New York City Department of Transportation. Available at: [2].
  3. “San Francisco Bike Laws,” San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency. Available at: [3].
  4. “District Department of Transportation,” District Department of Transportation. Available at: [4].
  5. “City of Houston Bicycle Ordinance,” BikeHouston. Available at: [5].
  6. Aultman-Hall, Lisa and Michael F. Adams Jr. (1998). “Sidewalk Bicycling Safety Issues,” University of Kentucky. Pp. 2. Available at: [6].
  7. McLaughlin, Karen A. and Ann Glang (2009). “The Effectiveness of a Bicycle Safety Program for Improving Safety-Related Knowledge and Behavior in Young Elementary Students,” Journal of Pediatric Psychology. Pp. 343-353. Available at: [7].
  8. Weddell, Angie, Meghan Winters, and Kay Teschke (2012). “Evidence from Safety Research to Update Cycling Training Materials in Canada,” University of British Columbia & Simon Fraser University. Available at: [8].
  9. Beck, L., A. Dellinger, and M. O’Neil (2007). “Motor vehicle crash injury rates by mode of travel, United States: using exposure-based methods to quantify differences,” American Journal of Epidemiology. Pp. 212-218. Available at: [9].
  10. Shinkle, Douglas (2012). “Transportation Review: Bicycle and Pedestrian Safety,” National Conference of State Legislatures. Available at: [10].
  11. Kelly, John (2014). “Cyclists explain why they sometimes ride on the sidewalk in downtown D.C.,” The Washington Post. Available at: [11].
  12. “Frequently Asked Questions,” Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center. Available at: Frequently Asked Questions.
  13. Jenkins, Mark (2013). “Squaring off on sidewalks,” The Washington Post. Available at: [12].
  14. Larsen, Hans F. (2013). “Bicycle Riding on Downtown Sidewalks,” City of San Jose. Available at: [13].
  15. “Bicycling and Walking in Virginia,” Virginia Department of Transportation. Available at: [14].
Related Policies



PolicyAtlas is maintained by volunteer contributors. For instructions on how to join PolicyAtlas, simply create an account and read about how to contribute a policy.

You can also follow @PolicyAtlas and contact us on: Twitter Icon.png Twitter, Facebook Icon.png Facebook, Instagram Icon.png Instagram and Email.